Most watchers of government might have suspected that restructures and redundancies were used to quietly get rid of the worst performers. Some have se
We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Features Public servants and free speech: knowing when to shut up
Text size :
TAGS Ethics, free speech
Free speech is a fundamental democratic value; the Australian constitution impliedly protects political communication. Why, then, is the government so keen to gag public servants?
In his 1644 work Areopagitica, John Milton wrote:
“Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.”
Some 370 years later, freedom of expression remains a cherished right upheld by a number of constitutions and conventions across the globe.
Yet the ability of Australian public servants to freely express their opinions, particularly of the political kind, is not so well protected. Although the Public Service Commission may have claimed in a 2012 circular that “APS employees have the same right to freedom of expression as other members of the community”, the caveat that followed has helped justify significant burdens: “subject to legitimate public interests”.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
John Wilson is the managing legal director of Bradley Allen Love in Canberra and an accredited specialist in industrial relations and employment law. He has twice appeared on the Best Lawyers list, and has an extensive public sector employment practice.
Read Related Content
NSW universities need to improve their risk management, improve information security and stop paying money to political parties, according to the state's auditor-general.
Most watchers of government might have suspected that restructures and redundancies were used to quietly get rid of the worst performers. Some have seen it first hand. Now, it's official.