Government agencies around Australia are standing up to support the campaign to end violence against women today for White Ribbon Day.
ALL THINGS P: The federal government wants to know which open data would be most useful to business, researc
We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Features Whistleblower protections: what you need to know
Text size :
TAGS Human resource management, industrial relations, Public Interest Disclosure Act, Whistleblower
Recently introduced legislation provides a protected avenue for the making of public interest disclosures and institutes heavy penalties for any related reprisal action. Ignore at your peril.
To little fanfare, the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (Cth) took effect in January. It provides, for the first time, stand-alone federal protections for public sector whistleblowers, and establishes mechanisms for handling disclosures. As the legislation is less than a year old, it is difficult to judge its effectiveness, and there is also little case law to illustrate the statutory scheme’s practical application. Thankfully, however, the act itself is relatively straightforward.
The legislation came in response to a parliamentary committee report, which addressed the need for a comprehensive whistleblower protection scheme in the Commonwealth public service. As was noted in the second reading speech, until the introduction of this legislation the Commonwealth was “the only Australian jurisdiction that does not have legislation dedicated to facilitating public interest disclosures and protecting those who make them”.
To start with, the statute affords two-pronged protection for disclosers: a shield and a sword. Section 10 provides a strong layer of armour: namely, that a discloser has immunity from civil, criminal or administrative liability and absolute privilege in defamation proceedings. In sum, so long as the discloser is not knowingly making a false or misleading public interest disclosure, they receive almost total protection from litigious recrimination.
The sword element is just as powerful: if a person “takes a reprisal” causing detriment against the discloser, and that act or omission is motivated partly or wholly by the disclosure, the affected party can seek compensation or an injunction in the federal courts. Moreover, taking such a reprisal — or even threatening to do so — constitutes a criminal offence, with a penalty of two years imprisonment and/or 120 penalty units (currently $20,400).
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
John Wilson is the managing legal director of Bradley Allen Love in Canberra and an accredited specialist in industrial relations and employment law. He has twice appeared on the Best Lawyers list, and has an extensive public sector employment practice.
Read Related Content