We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home News Findings against public servants in royal commission ‘regrettable’
Text size :
TAGS Royal Commission, home insulation, Department of Environment
The royal commission says public servants should be examined for wrongdoing in the home insulation rollout. The Public Service Commission calls it “regrettable”.
The public service commissioner says it’s “regrettable” findings were made against senior public servants in the royal commission into home insulation. And the federal department responsible for the management of the botched pink batts program is examining the recommendations, including whether senior public servants should face action.
Ian Hanger’s final report into Labor’s “poorly planned and poorly implemented” economic stimulus program is damning of both the directions from government and the work of departments “ill-equipped” to manage the scheme, which resulted in the deaths of four insulation installers.
The report is critical of a number of senior bureaucrats in the Department of Environment. Hanger found Kevin Keefe, who ran the program, and Beth Brunoro, a former director in the Home Energy Branch, were advised of the serious risk posed by installing reflective foil in homes but “did nothing to further investigate it”. “They should have done so,” the report states.
David Hoitink was also criticised for concluding the federal government could leave health and safety regulation to the states and territories.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
Jason Whittaker is managing editor of The Mandarin based in Melbourne. He has written for and edited political, business and culture publications for a decade. He spent two years as editor of sister Private Media publication Crikey.
Read Related Content
The federal government wants advice on cutting carbon in a draft for its Emissions Reduction Fund. Three draft methods cover landfill, waste and coal mining.
The new Victorian government has increased spending growth from 2.5% to 3% in its first budget. The Mandarin has the portfolio-by-portfolio breakdown of funding shifts.
Could one reason for the failure of senior managers to identify and manage the risks to installers be the
lack of scientific or technical elements in their background? Shouldn’t science and/or engineering qualifications be prerequisite or at least desirable for senior positions in departments with carriage of areas like climate change, environment and water, industry and ‘home energy’? Or is generic managerialism unchallengeable?
Jason Whittaker | Editor
The Mandarin | http://www.themandarin.com.au 03 8623 9912 | email@example.com @thetowncrier (Twitter) | jasonawhittaker (Skype)