How do you eliminate unconscious bias for government job applicants with a criminal history or adverse credit background? New 'ban the box' rules beco
Even the office of Victorian privacy commissioner David Watts has accidentally used CC, when they should have used BCC...
Department of Defence secretary Dennis Richard isn't going quietly. Due to retire within months, the infamously gruff mandarin made it clear to staff
We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Features ‘Double dipping’ public servant parents lose twice
Text size :
TAGS Parental leave, Human resource management, industrial relations, Employment compensation, Labour relations, Sick leave, Collective bargaining, Labour law
Public sector workers using both employer and government-sponsored paid parental leave have been accused of “double dipping”. As a result they’re set to lose both the wages they originally sacrificed for their existing scheme and the value of the scheme itself.
In times of fiscal austerity, governments as employers seek to curb labour costs. This is currently occurring within the Australian public service. One way of reducing costs is to limit wage rises and reduce conditions of employment through enterprise negotiations. The Australian government has suggested savings could be made through negotiating reduced sick leave. On top of this, public servants look set to lose a parental leave payment.
Reports have suggested 80,000 employees including public servants will be worse off by $11,500 after the government announced employees would no longer be entitled to receive parental leave pay from the Australian government, as well as PPL from their employer, should the latest proposal ever make it through parliament.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s original “signature” paid parental leave policy would have provided mothers with 26 weeks parental leave pay at an employee’s replacement wage.
My research, using the average salary of a public servant who works in one of the core public sector agencies in NSW (such as a government department, as opposed to those working in the wider public sector, for example, teachers or nurses), shows a female employee would have been approximately $6,000 better off under this policy.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
Lecturer, Human Resource Management, UNSW Canberra/Australian Defence Force Academy.
Read Related Content