Most watchers of government might have suspected that restructures and redundancies were used to quietly get rid of the worst performers. Some have se
We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Features Tough rules driving down innovation?
Text size :
TAGS IP Australia, Australian patent law, Patent law, Advisory Council of Intellectual Property, Ian Harper
Has Australia really lost its innovation spark? Or have we simply made it harder to get those ideas patented? Australian residents are now filing more patents overseas than they domestically after changes raised the bar for inventive thresholds.
The number of patent applications filed over a period is often used as a measure of an nation’s success in innovation. But the latest figures released by IP Australia show there’s been a decline in the number of applications filed.
Australia has a two-tier patent system. A standard patent provides exclusive rights in the invention for 20 years and an innovation patent that only grants eight years of protection.
The main difference is in the level of inventiveness that each application is assessed against by IP Australia. Logically, a standard patent is assessed at a higher level in terms of advances over existing technologies.
Intellectual Property (IP) rights are issued by territory. This means that registration of IP must be sought in each country that an IP owner wishes to have legal protection for their invention.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
Tyrone Berger is law lecturer and PhD candidate at Monash University, researching patents, competition law and technology standards.
Read Related Content
Most watchers of government might have suspected that restructures and redundancies were used to quietly get rid of the worst performers. Some have seen it first hand. Now, it's official.