We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home News The no-onesies rule: common sense vs abundant caution sparks storm of fashion critiques
Text size :
TAGS Department of Immigration and Border Protection, Infant bodysuit, Boots, Ugg boots, Culture, Clothing
Common sense met abundant caution in a perfect storm of click-bait yesterday, when one big department revealed the new dress standards that emerged from its discussions with staff.
Onesies are not acceptable attire for work in the Department of Immigration and Border Protection, it was confirmed yesterday in a slightly silly moment at Senate Estimates.
Neither are Ugg boots or thongs, or even jeans, although one suspects rebellious casual clothing aficionados may be able to slip through the net by choosing plain grey or black denim.
In a brief period of levity in yesterday’s rather serious legal and constitutional affairs hearing, DIBP secretary Michael Pezzullo confirmed he had been asked to make a determination on whether “the wearing of onesies” should be acceptable.
“I didn’t even know what a onesie was and I was shown, err, pictures of such garments,” said Pezzullo.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
Stephen Easton is a journalist at The Mandarin based in Canberra. He's previously reported for Canberra CityNews and worked on industry titles for The Intermedia Group.
Read Related Content
Pingback: Lastest Dress Sense News | Fashion:Dress and Taste()