Most watchers of government might have suspected that restructures and redundancies were used to quietly get rid of the worst performers. Some have se
We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Features Entitlements scandals demand integrity, not more rules
Text size :
TAGS corruption, Ethics, Integrity, Political corruption, Bronwyn Bishop, Integrity Management, Ethical leadership
Persistent beliefs that corruption in government is endemic and unsolvable are simply not true, writes public policy professor Adam Graycar, former SA Cabinet Office head and author of Understanding and Preventing Corruption. More rules won’t stop the remaining Bronwyn Bishops, but a focus on integrity culture might.
Bronwyn Bishop resigned after a couple of weeks of controversy about entitlements. The controversy has not gone away, as the net has widened and a review is underway. The surprising thing is not that she resigned, but that the debate went on for so long. The week before, it was a member of the UK House of Lords.
“It’s not for lunch, luvvie darling — it’s paying for this”. These were the words of a member of the British House of Lords in response to an incredulous young lady who asked him if he really received £200 a day for expenses. The Deputy Speaker was filmed snorting cocaine which had been placed on the sex worker’s breast.
The politician resigned his post and quit the the House of Lords but this episode again highlighted the public’s scepticism of politicians’ entitlements, and concern about how taxpayers’ money is spent. At least he made no attempt to justify the action or to try to claim it was related, however obtusely, to his work. Ironically, Lord Sewel had written in the Huffington Post a few days earlier about the importance of politicians upholding behavioural standards, and about how easily bad behaviour can damage revered institutions.
Integrity and accountability are bedrock principles of good government. Without them all the hard work and governmental expertise comes to nothing. It is often said that corruption in government is endemic, and has always been so, and will always be with us. This is simply not true. In many countries egregious corruption has been reduced dramatically, and over a long period of time Australia has moved from a convict colony marred by corruption to a country in which the daily lives of citizens are not blighted by corruption. This is not to say that Australia does not have its share of scandals, nor that integrity and accountability could not easily be undermined.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
Adam Graycar is a professor in the School of Social and Policy Studies at Flinders University, and previously professor of public policy at Australian National University and director of the Transnational Research Institute on Corruption (TRIC). Adam also has 22 years of senior executive experience in public services, including as head of the South Australian Cabinet Office and the Australian Institute of Criminology. His recent research has focused on corruption.
Read Related Content
BREAKING: Megan Latham has stepped down as head of the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption ahead of major reform, and will return to the NSW Supreme Court.
Most watchers of government might have suspected that restructures and redundancies were used to quietly get rid of the worst performers. Some have seen it first hand. Now, it's official.
well said, thank you..
loss of pension ought to be mandatory for those that are exposed and “convicted”
Well said Adam. It was disappointing to hear an ex-pollie on QandA use the “rules can be confusing” defence. The rules are clear cut and a condition of employment. And even if the use of a helicopter (hypothetically) isn’t expressly forbidden, common sense should be the very least we expect.