We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Portfolio Administration & HR FOI, frankness & formulating policy under the cone of silence
Text size :
TAGS Peter Shergold, John Fraser, John Lloyd, Andrew Metcalfe, classification, cabinet-in-confidence
Over-classification and ‘policy advice by post-it note’ has become the norm, says former Immigration secretary Andrew Metcalfe after canvassing the views of his departmental secretary colleagues. Rather than fight it, extend protections to deliberative documents.
A greater range of deliberative documents should be covered by protections similar to cabinet-in-confidence classification, says former departmental secretary Andrew Metcalfe, to restore the trust and frankness between officials and ministers.
Policy formation “has been adversely impacted by the potential of disclosure of deliberative material” argued the former Immigration secretary at last week’s Australia and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG) conference.
In a talk entitled “Policy advice by post-it note”, Metcalfe added to previous comments from Treasury secretary John Fraser and Australian Public Service Commissioner John Lloyd that the possibility of advice to ministers being publicly exposed had led to much politically sensitive material never being written down, or scrawled on non-disclosable post-it notes.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
David Donaldson is a journalist at The Mandarin based in Melbourne. He's previously written for The Guardian and Crikey and holds a masters in international relations.
Read Related Content
So basically it is like the politically correct notions we are supposed to espouse but behind closed doors we are saying what we like. If your ideas are above board then why should you worry what possible outcomes of disclosure are. In the end it will keep people on their toes and formulate more honest practice.