They're some of the most remarkable people in government, the who's who of the sector, across all tiers. We have the list of new IPAA national fellows
Can the public sector reshape its ethos and culture in an up-to-the-minute context? Or does it constrain innovation and collaboration? The public sect
The draft of Australia's national action plan on open government should be out soon. Public consultation on the draft will have to be brief for the fi
We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
We hope you've enjoyed The Mandarin. You are entitled to four articles each month without subscribing to a FREE membership.
To keep reading, join over 7,000 members who receive unlimited access to all the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives, and receive The Juice (our e-newsletter) three times a week.
Receive unlimited access
Get all the latest news on policy program and public projects
The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox
Home Features Letting the people decide … but will government listen?
Text size :
PEOPLEMaria Katsonis, Nicholas Reece
TAGS Consultation, Crowdsourcing, digital engagement, Maria Katsonis, Nicholas Reece, Public engagement, Stakeholder engagement
FEATURE: We have the technology to allow citizens to have more input in policymaking, but nothing will improve without willing governments and informed citizens. The growing debate on crowdsourcing.
If we now have the technology to allow citizens to vote directly on all issues, what job remains for public servants?
While new technology may provide new options to contribute, the really important thing is governmental willingness to actually listen, says Maria Katsonis, the Victorian Department of Premier and Cabinet’s director of equality.
The balance between citizen consultation and public service expertise in decision-making remains a hot debate, with South Australian Premier Jay Weatherill warning last year that while expertise in policy is important, overzealous bureaucrats and politicians can disenfranchise citizens.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
David Donaldson is a journalist at The Mandarin based in Melbourne. He's previously written for The Guardian and Crikey and holds a masters in international relations.
Read Related Content
There is almost a technocratic assumption in here that government would pay some attention to the electorate if only it knew what it thought through better crowdsourcing.
But on many issues, one could argue that the government and the opposition probably know what the electorate wants, but are bipartisanly determined to ignore it, because what would it know, and it doesn’t have the same clout as international allies or powerful local lobby groups.
Let me see know, immigration policy, over-population policy, national security policy, ‘free trade’ agreements, climate policy, renewables, religious school over-funding, rendition to Nauru, urban transport policy, tax and revenue policies, etc, etc….