Government agencies around Australia are standing up to support the campaign to end violence against women today for White Ribbon Day.
ALL THINGS P: The federal government wants to know which open data would be most useful to business, researc
We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Features Pensions and asset deeming: the real reform needed
Text size :
TAGS asset deeming, federal budget, Pension
Reform of asset deeming must go beyond recent changes proposed by the government. It’s a modest budget saving and doesn’t ensure the pension goes to those who need it most.
Most of the 530,000 income support recipients who will be hit by proposed changes to asset deeming in the federal budget will be those with a moderate amount of assets. Those at the top end of town will be left largely unscathed.
For the age pension in particular, deeming is a very important — though little understood — aspect of Australia’s income support system. Deeming essentially assumes (deems) a set rate of return on pensioners’ financial assets. This deemed income is then means-tested along with other forms of income, thereby reducing pension entitlements.
Under the current regime, the first $48,000 of a single age pensioner’s assets are deemed to earn a return of 2%, while assets beyond this are deemed to earn 3.5%. The government proposes moving the threshold down from $48,000 to $30,000.
The deemed return is considerably lower than the returns pensioners would receive on investments in financial markets. Deeming therefore reduces the impact of the income means test, raising pension payments and widening pension eligibility beyond what it would be if the actual income that were earned were means-tested.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
Matthew Taylor is a research fellow in the economics program at The Centre for Independent Studies. He has previously worked for a number of universities and government agencies.
Read Related Content
Serious political courage was required by one G F Richardson (Min. for Social Security ) in the very early 90’s particularly in taking on the ABA and the big four who were very happy indeed for pensioners to have substantial funds sitting in current accounts earning nil (or next to) interest. Convincing the pensioner community that a) they could be better off by getting a decent rate of return required highest order salesmanship.