Biological women who identify as women need not fear their anti-discrimination protections will be stripped. Defence issued a new statement walking ba
We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Features Policy in a puff of smoke: vexed options on vaping regulation
Text size :
PEOPLERon Borland, Ian Olver
DEPARTMENTSDepartment of Health
TAGS Healthcare, public health, federal Department of Health, Tobacco, e-cigarette
Research on e-cigarettes outsourced by the Department of Health is due in June. It’s a polarised debate: should vaping be encouraged and controlled, tightly restricted, or banned?
By the end of June, the Department of Health should be in a better position to advise on what is to be done about electronic cigarettes, when an outsourced policy research project on the controversial public health issue is due for delivery.
January 9 was the closing date for tenders from anyone who fancies they can identify and analyse policy options on vaping, as the pastime is known. Health’s requirements include a summary of evidence around “the risks and potential benefits to population health” as well as analysis of existing regulations at all levels of government and attempts to discourage e-cigarette use in Australia, international responses, and any other information that could shine a light on the pros and cons of the devices. The department specifies:
“This information should include but may not be limited to: prevalence of use of electronic nicotine delivery systems, records of adverse events (such as poisonings from nicotine ingestion), environmental health issues, and marketing practices including public relations and lobbying.”
The research project will then need to identify “policy options to minimise the risks” of e-cigarettes, put together a discussion paper and run a “targeted consultation process with key stakeholders who have relevant technical expertise and knowledge”.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
Stephen Easton is a journalist at The Mandarin based in Canberra. He's previously reported for Canberra CityNews and worked on industry titles for The Intermedia Group.
Read Related Content
According to ACT Health, there are difficulties with capturing reliable data about non-admitted patient services in lots of places. It's only about 1% of the territory's total federal health funding, but it's still $3 million they could have had.