We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Features Who wins when states privatise electricity?
Text size :
TAGS Environment, Energy policy, resources, privatisation, asset recycling, Australian Labor Party
The head of Australia’s retail energy lobby, and former energy advisor to Labor governments, says the public interest is better served by electricity privatisation — and evidence from SA and Victoria supports this.
In two state elections in 2015, those of Queensland and New South Wales, the privatisation of electricity networks has been front and centre in the election campaign. The outcomes differed, but in both cases state Labor parties took a very public stand against privatisation. Some have even claimed that Queensland Labor’s unexpected victory resulted from their clear commitment to ongoing public ownership of electricity networks.
Fact or fallacy, there is no doubt that public opinion was on Labor’s side on the issue, with the same polls which predicted the victory of the Coalition in NSW, also showing public disapproval of their signature electricity privatisation policy. The NSW sales will almost certainly go ahead, but thanks to the compromises the Coalition made pre-election, the regional electricity networks will remain in public hands — absent a change of heart from the National Party — for the long term.
All of this is in spite of clear evidence that the private electricity networks of Victoria and South Australia are more efficient and have contributed less to electricity price rises, than their publicly owned counterparts in NSW and Queensland. Electricity in the privatised states is just as reliable and is regulated in the same way it is in the publicly owned states, with the monopoly networks subject to five year determinations by the Australian Energy Regulator.
It seems that no matter what the evidence, the public has a strong attachment to the notion that an essential service like electricity networks should remain owned by “us”. That doesn’t mean it is right. In these poll driven times, it is to Mike Baird’s credit that he was prepared to use his personal appeal to argue for an initiative that lacked public support.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
Cameron O'Reilly is CEO of the Energy Retailers Association. He was a Fulbright Professional Scholar in Australia-US Alliance Studies in 2008. He was a policy adviser to then-federal transport minister Laurie Brereton.
Read Related Content