Hypothetically, what benefit could closed government offer?

Would switching off the phones and cameras in parliament for a year improve government? Professor Paul ‘t Hart argues it might. Although there are benefits to greater openness, one needn’t be as cynical as Sir Humphrey Appleby to identify there are costs too.

Paul 't Hart

Paul ‘t Hart

What would happen if we eliminated transparency from the political system for twelve months? We might actually get more sensible debate and better policy, reckons Professor Paul ‘t Hart of the Utrecht School of Governance.

Acknowledging that this is a “controversial” position to take, an optimistic ‘t Hart asked the Australia and New Zealand School of Government conference:

“Is there such a thing as virtuous ignorance? I think there is. Personally, this is no longer evidence based professor speaking, this is Paul ‘t Hart citizen, I’d love to have an experiment where we remove cameras and smartphones from parliament for a year or two.

FREE membership to The Mandarin

Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.

The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.