The Commonwealth's new 'optional' digital identity platform Govpass is getting nearing. Today the government released its first video demonstrating ho
Trump is unlikely to support Australia's agenda as it takes up a three-year seat on the UN Human Rights Council.
We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Features Collegiality and the collaboration paradox for bureaucratic reform
Text size :
PEOPLEShane Rattenbury, Bronwen Overton-Clarke, Allan Hawke, Cheryl Vardon
TAGS corruption, ACT, recruitment, code of conduct, public sector reform, misconduct, Senior Executive Service, Integrity, reform, Fraud, values, collaboration, SES, ACTPS, ACT public sector standards commissioner, merit, secondment, cross-agency, whole of government
Five years in the making, reform of the ACT public service legislation confronts a common paradox: cross-government collaboration is vital, but the Westminster tradition naturally creates bureaucratic silos.
The biggest changes to the ACT public service in years will create a stronger integrity framework, improve cross-agency collaboration, simplify recruitment and enable secondments with other governments, companies and not-for-profits.
Those, at least, are some of the aims of the bill to amend the ACT Public Sector Management Act 1994 that passed this month, carrying out a public service modernisation agenda devised by former federal mandarin Allan Hawke five years ago. Especially visible changes will be a senior executive service increasing executive mobility, and the return of an independent ACTPS standards commissioner.
Most recently, the bill’s critics claimed it was an attempt to gag all those employed under it and force them to dob in errant colleagues for even the most minor misdemeanours. Two sections were then altered, after a legislative assembly committee and the ACT Human Rights Commission both expressed concerns that the bill would impinge on freedom of speech and unacceptably widen the scope of poor behaviour that must be reported.
As it stands, the territory’s public servants can still publicly criticise the government in their private capacity, according to public service commissioner Bronwen Overton-Clarke. The act prohibits behaviour that contravenes the ACTPS values or undermines its “integrity and good reputation” whether at work, on social media or elsewhere.
Receive unlimited access, get all the latest public sector news and features, plus The Juice, our daily news update sent direct to your inbox.
The Mandarin is where Australia's public sector leaders discuss their work and the issues faced within modern bureaucracy. Join today to discover the latest in public administration thinking and news from our dedicated reporters, current and former agency heads and senior executives.
Stephen Easton is a journalist at The Mandarin based in Canberra. He's previously reported for Canberra CityNews and worked on industry titles for The Intermedia Group.
Read Related Content
The turmoil of APS cuts, enterprise bargaining and cabinet instability stand in contrast to the stable, happy relationships most federal public servants have with their immediate supervisors. APSC says this is its key strength.