• Premium
  • Small Logo
  • About
  • Partner Pages
  • Support & FAQs
  • Log in

The Mandarin

The Mandarin
The Mandarin
  • Small Logo
  • Premium
  • Careers
    • Search SES Jobs
    • Career Advice
  • News
  • Editors' Picks
  • Portfolios
  • Events
  • Resource library
  • Small Logo
  • Premium
  • Careers
    • Search SES Jobs
    • Career Advice
  • News
  • Editors' Picks
  • Portfolios
  • Events
  • Resource library
Home Features Digitally transforming NSW: what public sector executives really think

Digitally transforming NSW: what public sector executives really think

By Julian Bajkowski

Monday September 11, 2017

Digital technology is spearheading a profound transformation of the public sector, challenging traditional public agency governance models which are still often based on ‘analogue age’ frameworks that require modernisation for a rapidly evolving operating environment

While many of the key philosophical pillars of governance – transparency, accountability, auditability and confidentiality – remain constant, the underlying mechanisms and systems have not always kept pace.

An area of increasing urgency for agencies and their leaders, as well as industry and expert advisors, is information governance as modes of engagement evolve to reflect the needs of government and stakeholders.

The context

In mid-2017 The Mandarin in conjunction with subject matter expert Objective Corporation held an executive learning and development seminar in Sydney to tease out pertinent themes and issues surrounding digital transformation and information governance.

Attended by executives from key New South Wales and federal agencies with a passion for the impact of digital transformation on governance and information management, the collaborative event produced a frank and practical discourse. It identified crucial new challenges, real world solutions, approaches and skills in navigating a rapidly evolving agenda all workshopped from the floor.

Moderated by The Mandarin’s publisher Tom Burton and held under Chatham House rules, the expert panel included NSW Information Commissioner Elizabeth Tydd, NSW Department of Justice chief information officer Aaron Liu and Objective Corporation’s public sector solutions director Sonya Sherman.

Pertinent themes very quickly emerged from the discussion:

Information governance, organisational governance and outcomes must connect

A mission critical challenge immediately cited is that governance and agency outcomes do not and cannot exist in isolation. This extends right across information governance, corporate governance, privacy, data collection and utilisation and the pursuit of improved services and administration.

Good information governance was repeatedly referenced as a key enabler to improvements because it addressed the ‘silo’ effect of disparate information systems and standards that impede progress. Equally it also fostered a culture of more trusted and transparent corporate culture, collaboration and organisational governance.

Examples ranged from automating access controls over documents and files to better and more secure management of information across multiple organisations, networks, devices and locations.

Focusing on the transformation challenge.

In terms of best practice, participants cited examples where automated governance had enabled secure sharing or automated release of information to the public, without the need for government staff to navigate complex policies or repeatedly make manual decisions around the same types of information.

There was a strong concurrence that a key learning to date has been all governance measures need to pragmatically improve outcomes and delivery while still balancing a number of interests. Process for processes’ sake is simply no longer an option in a modern and technologised public sector.

READ MORE IN THIS SERIES
▪ Trust, privacy and accessible data: can you really have it all?
▪ Why information governance underpins digital government
▪ How can agencies promote ‘information confidence’?
▪ Building trust in government
▪ Joining the dots: pathways for sharing information safely across silos

Taking trust to heart

Senior executives readily acknowledged governments are moving irreversibly to a ‘digital first’ posture; yet to make this work, skilled management and the appropriate tools are needed for government to deliver outcomes for citizens. Lack of access to ‘governance grade’ tools and systems introduced new risks through phenomena like ‘shadow IT’.

Participants frankly called out the rising tempo of digital transformation activities as agencies adopt a deliberate outward focus to engage with citizens and stakeholders more directly. While silos no longer ‘cut it’ in a collaborative public sector, key principles and business rules must still apply.

Solid information governance quickly emerged as a core foundation for successful digitisation of government services – both internal and external.

Top challenges for participants included:

  •         Making information governance an integral in creating accountability frameworks for creating, valuing, using and managing data.
  •         Competing expectations of service convenience (eg instantaneous, intuitive access) and privacy, information assurance and confidentiality.
  •         Necessity for trust to be earned by government rather than taken for granted.  

Participants called out that enhanced trust provides government greater efficacy in service delivery and creates a symbiosis in advancing citizen priorities and the democratic process.

Conversely, lack of trust can produce ‘information asymmetry’ underscoring why good information governance foundations are needed to prevent erosion of confidence.

Culture must rise to context

Panellists and participants observed government now faces differing expectations from customers and stakeholders in how information and data, especially in the digital context, is collected, utilised and managed.

Trust and privacy have become both essential yet paradoxical: people increasingly share their private lives and personal data online through social media, yet remain cautious about how government agencies collect and share information and for what purposes.

There was solid agreement citizens expect ‘joined-up’ services from government on par with commercial experiences that deliver simple and seamless services.

Yet a heightened public expectation exists that personal information and data will be held even more securely and subject to stringent safeguards especially around social services, health and common transactions.

Governance is about appropriate access, not barriers

A case in point raised in the discussion was that repeated requests for similar data between agencies (a consequence lack of secure information management and sharing) is increasingly viewed as ‘over collection’ and has become a friction point for services.

The ability to manage interactions across multiple agencies from a single point or account is a major focal point for most jurisdictions, but progress can be undone if good information governance foundations are not present from the start.

  •         Risk management of information needs to be intelligent and informed. Compliance should not be an obstacle to service improvement.
  •         Good governance involves understanding the rules, roles and responsibilities for managing data and information — and why contexts can be both specific and variable.
  •         Codifying rules allows automation that accelerates and improve services. The burden of highly manual and repetitive decision making, which can be inconsistent, is reduced producing efficiency and service improvement.

Room for improvement: channelling information flow

The theme of ‘digital by default’ was persistently cited by executives as both a top-line expectation and operational mindset for government.

This translates to secure accessibility across a range of touch points and channels that were ‘always on’, it was brokered. To achieve this, information and data has to flow more readily. Information governance facilitates and regulates this flow, but many improvements are needed at a number of levels.

Executives were adamant that a number of key areas still need to be addressed in terms of improvement.

Specific pain points included:

  •         There is generational change in the public sector workforce with 70% of staff soon to be digitally native Millennials. Re-teaching manual or paper based processes will not succeed at either organisational or service delivery levels.
  •         The speed at which data and information is needing to be accessed has increased sharply. It’s no longer static or historical but dynamic and real time.
  •         The range and types of information and data now being used and included in digital interactions is increasing and will continue to do so.

While senior executives were highly cognizant of the challenges at hand, there were also candidly pragmatic suggestions. One participant observed that although information governance increased speed, in reality customer trust is still built incrementally. Successful smaller steps are first needed to build confidence allowing bigger ones.

Equally, there was frank recognition that understanding end user needs is still imperative. ‘Digital’ cannot merely be applied as a label. Essential principles remain and must be applied. This included retaining control over the creation, access to and distribution of information and data.

Conclusion: Governance as a platform for innovation and change

Our understanding of information governance needs to move beyond compliance – it enables both digital government and open government, and is simply good business.

It was strongly agreed continued collaboration between the public sector, subject matter experts and stakeholders must continue to deliver improvements for the public good.

 

About the author
Avatar

By Julian Bajkowski

Julian Bajkowski is an award-winning journalist, editor and adviser who specialises in explaining developments in business, technology, policy and finance. Prior to becoming managing editor of The Mandarin, he worked in senior editorial roles at the Australian Financial Review, ACP, IDG and the Intermedia Group, and has been a public policy and corporate affairs adviser at MasterCard.

People: Aaron Liu Elizabeth Tydd Sonya Sherman Tom Burton

Companies: Objective Corporation

Departments: Department of Justice NSW NSW Information Commissioner Premier and Cabinet NSW

Partners: Objective Corporation

Tags: collaboration Culture information governance ministerial brief personal information risk management shadow IT Stakeholder engagement

Login
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The essential resource for effective
public sector professionals

Check out the Latest

By Julian Bajkowski

Monday September 11, 2017
Avatar
Text size: A A A

Upcoming Events

01
Apr
Postgraduate studies in regulation and governance at ANU RegNet
14
Jul
Building Visibility + Influence for Women in the Public Sector – MASTERCLASS
29
Jul
Breakfast Briefing: Building and retaining the public sector workforce
03
Aug
Playing Bigger: Uplevelling Influence + Impact for Public Sector Leaders – ONLINE PROGRAM
15
Aug
CILT International Diploma in Logistics and Transport (Public-Sector)
View Calendar

Partner Content

Joining forces to address digital barriers to government services
Promoted

Joining forces to address digital barriers to government services

eBook: Digitisation and Modernisation in Public Health Organizations

eBook: Digitisation and Modernisation in Public Health Organizations

eBook: How to build a Healthy Performance Culture

eBook: How to build a Healthy Performance Culture

Latest Jobs


  • Head of Programs

    Cranlana Centre for Ethical Leadership at Monash University

    • VIC CBD
    Closing date 22nd July, 2022
    5 days ago Full Time - Fixed Term
  • General Manager Decision Support Services

    Bureau of Meteorology

    • National
    Closing date 10th July, 2022
    7 days ago Full Time - Ongoing
  • Multiple Directors - Engagement, Partnerships and Communications

    Department of Customer Service

    • NSW CBD, Regional
    Closing date 1st June, 2022
    1 month ago Full Time - Fixed Term
  • Executive Director Corporate Services - Canberra, Melbourne or Sydney

    Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity

    • VIC CBD
    Closing date 3rd July, 2022
    8 days ago Full Time - Ongoing
  • Executive Director Corporate Services - Canberra, Melbourne or Sydney

    Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity

    • ACT CBD, Regional
    Closing date 3rd July, 2022
    8 days ago Full Time - Ongoing
  • Executive Director Corporate Services - Canberra, Melbourne or Sydney

    Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity

    • NSW
    Closing date 3rd July, 2022
    8 days ago Full Time - Ongoing
Search All Jobs

Login

Get Premium now. Not ready? Get the free Daily newsletter.

Forgot password?

Share via email

Access your 3 free Mandarin Premium articles

As part of your free trial you will receive 'The Juice', The Mandarin's daily free newsletter, the 'Premium wrap' every Saturday and marketing emails. You can opt out at any time.
Content
  • Small Logo
  • News
  • Research Series
  • Features
  • Portfolios
  • Jurisdictions
  • New Zealand
  • People & Capability
  • Thought Leadership
  • Editors' Picks
  • Resource Library
  • Site Map
Products & Services
  • Small Logo
  • The Juice Newsletter
  • Partner & Advertising solutions
  • Mandarin Live
  • Public Sector Events Calendar
  • Partner Content
  • Premium
  • Careers
Legal
  • Small Logo
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Usage
  • Code of Conduct
Connect
  • Small Logo
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Support
  • Our Team
Social
Copyright © The Mandarin
Private Media logo CRIKEY SMARTCOMPANY
wpDiscuz