Public servants shouldn't be earning the same soaring salaries as private sector executives, declared New Zealand's State Services Commissioner in hi
Slavery-like practices continue to be found around Australia today, a federal joint committee has found, despite a national action plan involving 11 C
We recently moved our readers to a new system. You may need to reset your password here to login.
Not a member ? Join here for free.
Forgot your password?
Home Features Departmental secretaries: how the pecking order really works
Text size :
Several times a year the little book of names that includes politicians, judges and generals, bishops and bureaucrats is updated for overly eager young aides-de-camp and protocol officers.
But it’s to Australia’s great credit that just about the only time the Commonwealth Table of Precedence is adhered to is when the Queen is in earshot.
In practice, Australia’s dignitaries walk into state functions in whatever order they arrive. Even in the High Court, one this country’s last vestiges of precedence protocol, if the Governor General’s car is ‘disastrously’ late, or early — as happened at the farewell for outgoing Chief Justice Robert French — the Vice-Regal heels do not cool waiting for the First Law Officer to scramble in first.
This is most noticeable when spending time in the home of the Westminster system, where the British class system and generous honours and knighthoods mean nearly everyone in Whitehall knows exactly who ranks higher, and who shouldn’t even think of cutting line before them.
If official precedence is irrelevant in modern Australia, how do senior departmental secretaries know their internal pecking order?
Salary is the only universal measure of importance among horizontal ‘equals’ in the modern workplace, and the Australian Public Service’s top tier is no exception. The “Departmental Secretaries – Classification Structure and Terms and Conditions” determination from the Remuneration Tribunal in June this year set out a new hierarchy that raised some departmental secretaries and lowered others.
At a practical level, all 19 departmental secretaries got an incremental payrise far above those of the rank and file APS employees, so they’re all winners, although some clearly more than others.
Foreign Affairs and Trade — was held by Peter Varghese and now by Frances Adamson — bumped up from Tier 1.2 into 1.1 and with it comes a salary bonus of ~$30K.
Infrastructure and Regional Development — was held by Mike Mrdak at the time and now by Dr Stephen Kennedy — bumped up a band from Tier 2.3 to 2.2 and a ~$20K salary bonus.
Industry, Innovation and Science — was held by Glenys Beauchamp and now by Dr Heather Smith — bumped up a symbolic tier from Tier 2.1 to 1.3 but comes with no bonus in salary.
Defence — was held by Dennis Richardson and now by Greg Moriarty — was always in the top tier along with the secretaries of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (Dr Martin Parkinson) and Treasury (John Fraser). But now the Secretary of Defence (SECDEF) is instead paired with their partner in the diarchy: the Chief of the Defence Force (CDF). Air Chief Marshall Mark Binskin and Moriarty are on both on more than $800K so they’re not doing it tough.
When the Rudd-Gillard-Rudd-era mega department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations was split up, it went from being a Tier 1.1 alongside Finance (Rosemary Huxtable) and Health (Glenys Beauchamp), to Tier 2.1 for Education (Dr Michele Bruniges) and Tier 2.2 for Employment (Kerri Hartland).
From this perspective is becomes clearer who the real winners and losers were in the recent reshuffle of departmental secretaries that saw some rise several tiers (with questionable runs on the board to justify such a promotion) and others sink.
Top photo: Only 12 months ago, but how many faces have changed. Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull with last year’s APS secretaries. Source: IPAA ACT
Tags : salaries