• Premium
  • Small Logo
  • About
  • Partner Pages
  • Support & FAQs
  • Log in

The Mandarin

The Mandarin
The Mandarin
  • Small Logo
  • Premium
  • Careers
    • Search SES Jobs
    • Career Advice
  • News
  • Editors' Picks
  • Portfolios
  • Events
  • Resource library
  • Small Logo
  • Premium
  • Careers
    • Search SES Jobs
    • Career Advice
  • News
  • Editors' Picks
  • Portfolios
  • Events
  • Resource library
Home Features The policy challenge of improving social mobility

The policy challenge of improving social mobility

By The Mandarin

Monday November 27, 2017

Governments have many programs that seek to improve disadvantage and ameliorate poverty. But how successful are they at enabling people, households and communities to leave behind their disadvantage and break the cycle of intergenerational disadvantage?

Governments, researchers and NGOs are seeking to better understand what the most powerful interventions are. What will materially improve the future prospects for children born to parents of a certain income, wealth, location or social group?

To understand the net impact of the interventions is a major organisational, evidence-gathering, and data research challenge, especially given the task of measuring long-run impacts.

Considering social mobility through place

One of the leading academic experts in social mobility, Raj Chetty, re-evaluated jointly with his colleagues the effects of a housing experiment implemented in three large US cities in the 1990s, namely Chicago, Los Angeles and New York.

The Moving to Opportunity experiment randomly allocated housing vouchers to a selected group of eligible individuals to move from high poverty neighbourhoods into low poverty neighbourhoods. The first evaluation (Katz et al, 2001) did not find any sizable positive difference between earnings of those who got the vouchers (the treatment group) and those who did not (the control group).

The earlier the intervention, the more value for money

A few years down the line, they found the experimental vouchers had indeed been successful, just not among eligible adults, but their children instead. Compared to the control group, children in families who moved to more prosperous areas ended up earning a 31% higher income on average, were 27% more likely to attend university and 30% less likely to become single parents than others in their age group.

Furthermore, the younger the child was when they moved out of a poor neighbourhood, the larger the income gain. In fact, moving after age 21 had virtually no impact on future adult earnings and also did not affect parental income.

Early childhood interventions are the key to social mobility

This findings suggests early life circumstances, rather than local labour market opportunities, are key to fostering intergenerational mobility. This is backed up by evidence-based research led by James Heckman, a Nobel laureate economist, showing that early childhood interventions yield extremely high economic and social returns in terms of adult wages (through higher tax contributions), reduced crime, decreased welfare dependency and crime incidence, as well as improved health.  

The power of states, regions and councils  

Australia has a very different setting than the US, where there are extremely large intergenerational mobility variations even within a city. But the Chetty work demonstrates the benchmark research approach needed to properly evaluate how to improve social mobility.

A local database with geographical localisation and measures of intergenerational mobility created by Chetty for the Equal Opportunity Project has enabled US policy makers to detect and prioritise the most problematic areas. The data exposes areas with a high density of families who can benefit most from mobility, which means they can be identified and targeted to obtain the highest returns on investment in developing human capital.  

The need for more accurate data to identify and implement cost-effective policies

This is a classic big data challenge, which in Australia is now being led by the Australian Research Council Life Course Centre of Excellence, working together with federal and state agencies to facilitate the access and linkage of administrative data from multilateral governmental bodies. The multifaceted nature of social mobility necessarily demands a co-ordinated commitment from all the relevant agencies involved to provide efficient data access. Much of this data and insight will need to come from local authorities and service providers to ensure the specificity needed to ensure programs are tailored to local needs.

A call for evidence-based policy interventions in Australia

Once data is available, the second key challenge is designing robust evidence-based policy evaluations, relying on randomised controlled trials or quasi-experiments. Chetty’s MTO experiment was able to measure with confidence the impact of the housing vouchers because they were allocated randomly to individuals who were similar in treatment and control groups. For obvious reasons, such evaluations should not be performed by government agencies but pursued and designed by highly-regarded independent researchers, working together with the government. Unfortunately, social program evaluations in Australia are rarely randomised and independently evaluated.

Randomisation allows for accurate measurement of outcomes

Policy interventions will be misleading if individuals eligible for say, social housing, choose to apply to be reallocated to a higher income neighbourhood instead of being randomly assigned.

If, for example, we observe that children of families who choose to be reallocated have higher earnings than those who do not sign up in the future, we cannot tell whether the program worked or those who were aware and applied for social housing are just different and more motivated than those who did not. Thus, we are unable to disentangle the effects of the program vs family characteristics if there is a selection of families with better prior characteristics who apply for reallocation.

A randomised pilot experiment with a large enough sample allows us to measure and compare the relative cost-effectiveness of different policies to choose from, when budget allocations need to be made.

Learning from mistakes

Many well-intended interventions can generate unintended consequences that we need to consider and understand. Several examples come from medicine, the discipline with the longest history of using RCTs. For instance, certain policies aimed at reducing teenage childbearing had the complete opposite effect. This strongly suggests we need to learn from experimental pilots, before rolling out universal policies.

And while some may argue that randomised trials benefit some who are not in need of help, the bigger benefit comes from being able to target programs that have a proven impact, rather than investing in large scale programs which have little benefit to the actual groups in most need.

The alternative: quasi-experimental evidence

When RCTs are not feasible, there are still certain policy designs that allow for evidence-based evaluation without explicitly generating control and experimental groups. For instance, program assignment lotteries or income eligibility thresholds allocate individuals who are arguably relatively similar into quasi-treatment and control groups, due to reasons beyond their control. While such program evaluations have certain caveats, they at least allow for second-best evaluations that are better than no evaluation at all.

Policy and research should go hand in hand

Given the complexity of evidence-based design of interventions and evaluations, it is obvious researchers and policy makers need to be working closely together to exchange evidence-based policy ideas and design policies that can be evaluated by independent parties. The ARC Linkage grants and the newly inaugurated Sydney Policy Lab at the University of Sydney are steps towards the right direction.

To drive such a broad based concept like social mobility needs a strongly coordinated and focused program of agencies, universities, NGOs and service providers, supported by government data and policy diagnosis.

References

Chetty, Raj, Hendren, Nathaniel and Katz, Lawrence F (2016). The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment’, American Economic Review 106(4): 855–902.

Katz, Lawrence F., Jerey B. Liebman, and Jerey R. Kling (2001). Moving to Opportunity in Boston: Early Results of a Randomized Mobility Experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (2): 607-654.

About the author
The Mandarin

By The Mandarin

The Mandarin staff journalists.

People: James Heckman Raj Chetty

Departments: Australian Research of Excellence Life Course Centre Jobs Sydney Policy Lab Transport and Resources Vic Department of Economic Development

Partners: Victoria Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources

Tags: Data analysis Policy evaluation random trials

Login
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The essential resource for effective
public sector professionals

Check out the Latest

By The Mandarin

Monday November 27, 2017
The Mandarin
Text size: A A A

Upcoming Events

25
May
Fundamentals of data literacy and visualisation
29
Apr
Science, Technology & Public Policy – Professional Short Course
23
Jun
12th Annual Budget Briefing Breakfast
17
Jun
INSPIRE: Behavioural Insights for Better Communications
01
Apr
Postgraduate studies in regulation and governance at ANU RegNet
View Calendar

Partner Content

eBook: Putting the ‘public’ into public sector transformation

eBook: Putting the ‘public’ into public sector transformation

Creating a culture of continuous learning
Promoted

Creating a culture of continuous learning

Does Australia have the domestic capability to weather a digital crisis?
Promoted

Does Australia have the domestic capability to weather a digital crisis?

Latest Jobs


  • Multiple Directors - Engagement, Partnerships and Communications

    Department of Customer Service

    • NSW CBD, Regional
    Closing date 1st June, 2022
    6 days ago Full Time - Fixed Term
  • Chief Digital and Technology Officer

    Department of Customer Service

    • NSW
    Closing date 20th May, 2022
    15 days ago Full Time - Ongoing
  • Chief Operating Officer

    Department of Customer Service

    • NSW CBD, Regional
    Closing date 16th May, 2022
    26 days ago Full Time - Ongoing
  • CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

    ACT Integrity Commission

    • ACT
    Closing date 13th June, 2022
    4 days ago Full Time - Fixed Term
Search All Jobs

Login

Get Premium now. Not ready? Get the free Daily newsletter.

Forgot password?

Share via email

Access your 3 free Mandarin Premium articles

As part of your free trial you will receive 'The Juice', The Mandarin's daily free newsletter, the 'Premium wrap' every Saturday and marketing emails. You can opt out at any time.
Content
  • Small Logo
  • News
  • Research Series
  • Features
  • Portfolios
  • Jurisdictions
  • New Zealand
  • People & Capability
  • Thought Leadership
  • Editors' Picks
  • Resource Library
  • Site Map
Products & Services
  • Small Logo
  • The Juice Newsletter
  • Partner & Advertising solutions
  • Mandarin Live
  • Public Sector Events Calendar
  • Partner Content
  • Premium
  • Careers
Legal
  • Small Logo
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Usage
  • Code of Conduct
Connect
  • Small Logo
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Support
  • Our Team
Social
Copyright © The Mandarin
Private Media logo CRIKEY SMARTCOMPANY
wpDiscuz